Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Darren Kushto
Paper author’s name: Paige Nauman
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
__that
joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to
others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs &
sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the
discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: Paige did really well to join a controversial topics and listened to both sides of the argument. She took information from many sources and gave a detailed description on his opinion on the argument.
[opening & introduction]
__that
contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces
the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a
forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: After reading her introduction I had a complete understanding of what her paper was going to be on.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: It was unclear what her research question and thesis were. But towards the end you could understand what her argument was.
[use of sources]
__where
Comment: Paige had good in-text citations where she had specific facts from her sources.
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Darren Kushto
Paper author’s name: Paige Nauman
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
__that
joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to
others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs &
sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the
discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: Paige did really well to join a controversial topics and listened to both sides of the argument. She took information from many sources and gave a detailed description on his opinion on the argument.
[opening & introduction]
__that
contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces
the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a
forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: After reading her introduction I had a complete understanding of what her paper was going to be on.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: It was unclear what her research question and thesis were. But towards the end you could understand what her argument was.
[use of sources]
__where
Comment: Paige had good in-text citations where she had specific facts from her sources.
__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: Her argument was consistent throughout the paper. Supported all her facts with citations and her opinion.
[conclusion]
__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment: Paper summed up the paper that gave the reader a complete understanding of the topic and argument.
[works cited and in-text citations]
__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
[sentence-level rhetoric]
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment: The writer had little to no grammatical and punctuation errors.
Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Darren Kushto
Paper author’s name: Jenna Fague
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
__that
joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to
others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs &
sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the
discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: Jenna had a very clear argument that I picked up after the first paragraph. But it seemed to be a "data dump" just spitting out information throughout her paper.
[opening & introduction]
__that
contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces
the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a
forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: After the first paragraph I knew her argument.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: Her research question was vague throughout her paper. I couldn't tell what her research question was.
[use of sources]
__where
the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or
quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their
thesis?
Comment: Jenna did a good job with in-text citations. She didn't claim any information as her own.
[paragraph construction]
__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: I felt her paragraphs were out of order. It seemed she kept going back and forth.
[conclusion]
__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment: Conclusion wraps up the paper but I was still unsure what the research question was.
[works cited and in-text citations]
__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment: MLA format was perfect of works cited page.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
Jenna had some of the most detailed sentences out of all the papers I read. But had an average amount of grammatical errors.
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Darren Kushto
Paper author’s name: Jenna Fague
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
__that
joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to
others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs &
sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the
discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: Jenna had a very clear argument that I picked up after the first paragraph. But it seemed to be a "data dump" just spitting out information throughout her paper.
[opening & introduction]
__that
contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces
the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a
forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: After the first paragraph I knew her argument.
[use of research question & thesis]
__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: Her research question was vague throughout her paper. I couldn't tell what her research question was.
[use of sources]
__where
the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or
quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their
thesis?
Comment: Jenna did a good job with in-text citations. She didn't claim any information as her own.
[paragraph construction]
__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: I felt her paragraphs were out of order. It seemed she kept going back and forth.
[conclusion]
__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment: Conclusion wraps up the paper but I was still unsure what the research question was.
[works cited and in-text citations]
__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment: MLA format was perfect of works cited page.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
Jenna had some of the most detailed sentences out of all the papers I read. But had an average amount of grammatical errors.
